I'll happily agree with all those saying that the President of the United States using the word "shit" in what he believed to be private is one of the least newsworthy angles on the current carnage in the Middle East. But seeing as it's in the news anyway, I think it's worth asking whether he really believed it to be private. As with other ostensibly unscripted accidental colorful moments from George Bush (see Paul Waldman's account in Being Right Is Not Enough of Bush calling the Times' Adam Clymer an "asshole"), this seems to read as easily as a scripted reminder that George Bush is a tough guy from the heartland who doesn't "take shit." What better contrast with the legions of smooth-talking caviar-eating French-speaking girly-men whom conservatives imagine sliding through the halls of the United Nations and the G8? What easier way to grab headlines pitting the President against inaction without requiring much in the way of action? And what could make for better Fox News headlines for a week than if some college professor somewhere comes forward criticizing Bush for using coarse language to talk about Hezbollah?


Blogger alek said...

1) This would be a lot more believable as a scripted gaffe if the other things said weren't so moronic, and if Tony Blair didn't look so bad.

2) You (and maybe Paul Waldman) watch too much West Wing.

("a gun metaphor?...that's unusual for you.")

7/18/2006 04:17:00 PM  
Blogger Zach said...

Right, the whole sweater thing doesn't exactly bolster the rugged masculinity of either party.

7/18/2006 04:53:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home