The Times reports on the no-longer repressed battle for the soul of the AFL-CIO:
In a sign of the jockeying and soul-searching, Andrew L. Stern, president of the Service Employees International Union, the A.F.L.-C.I.O.'s largest union, called yesterday in a letter for far-reaching changes in labor designed to increase its membership, proposing a $25-million-a-year campaign to unionize Wal-Mart and a near doubling in the amount spent annually on organizing...Mr. Stern said in his letter to the 54 members of the A.F.L.-C.I.O.'s Executive Council that President Bush's victory had intensified the need for change..And he said he wanted a vote on proposals for change before the president's inauguration in January, instead of at the labor convention in July. Mr. Stern's call for broad restructuring has fueled fierce divisions, even causing one union, the International Association of Machinists, to warn that it might quit the A.F.L.-C.I.O. if Mr. Stern prevails in his push to remake the federation. Adding to the tensions, some labor leaders say that a close ally of Mr. Stern, John W. Wilhelm, the longtime president of the hotel workers' union, might challenge Mr. Sweeney, who is up for re-election next year...Mr. Sweeney, the A.F.L.-C.I.O.'s president, called today's meeting to discuss proposals to reshape the union movement and to assess labor's political efforts this fall. He, too, sent a letter to labor leaders yesterday, saying that unions needed to reshape their movement "to better take on corporate America and win power for working families in today's economy." He added, "We should be big enough to discuss our different positions with respect for each other and without restoring to an 'us against them' stance." Mr. Stern's proposals would amount to a thoroughgoing restructuring of labor. In his letter he called for consolidating the federation's 60 unions, perhaps to less than 20, saying that many unions are too small to grapple with giant corporations. "Since the founding of the A.F.L.-C.I.O. nearly 50 years ago, our employers have changed, our industries have changed, technology has changed, and the global economy has changed," Mr. Stern said. "The labor movement has not kept pace with these changes. Today, workers and their families are paying the price," he said. Complaining that workers are often hurt when 10 or more unions represent workers in a single industry, Mr. Stern called for giving the A.F.L.-C.I.O. power to bar a union from negotiating a contract that undercuts the wages and benefits that unions in the same industry have already negotiated.No election in 2006 will be more crucial to the future of the progressive left and the prospects for dignity and justice for working families than this one.
3 Comments:
I think you're overemphasizing the importance of elections even here, though i appreciate your syndicalist fervor. What's important is the organizing that gets done. If Sweeney finds a way to make this happen in the next two years, that's fantastic. If not, well, we'll see what happens.
Thing is, it hasn't happened yet under Sweeney. But of course the organizing is the key. I'm just comparing one election to other elections...
right, i realize that, and i think you're right to direct folks' attention to what's going on in the labor movement. I guess i'm frustrated, though, by the extent to which all the times articles focus of "will wilhelm run for afl-cio presidency" while not covering the SF Lockout at all until last week, something which will prove far more important for the future of working class organizing across the globe.
Post a Comment
<< Home