Geoff Porter challenges the Bush administration gospel that the threat of pre-emption moved Libya: In 1999, Libya extradited two men implicated in the Pan Am 103 bombing over Lockerbie, Scotland, a decade earlier. The same year, it agreed to pay compensation for the victims of the bombing of a French airliner, UTA Flight 772, whose destruction over Niger was traced back to Libya. Discussions between the United States and Libya about its weapons of mass destruction programs also began that year. These discussions finally bore fruit last fall with Colonel Qaddafi's decision to renounce these weapons. It is true that this announcement came after Saddam Hussein's regime collapsed, but is a mistake to link these two events. Why? For one, history argues against it: Colonel Qaddafi did not respond to direct military strikes ordered by President Ronald Reagan in 1986, even when they cost the life of his adopted daughter. It would be misleading to suggest that this time around he was brought to heel by the mere specter of military action. Instead, Colonel Qaddafi's decision to abandon his weapons programs was motivated by domestic concerns. For 35 years Colonel Qaddafi has used oil to buy allegiance from Libyans. In exchange for their turning a blind eye to the lack of representative government and human rights abuses, Colonel Qaddafi is openhanded in distributing Libya's oil proceeds, sometimes as direct gifts to influential people and tribal leaders, but also in the form of state-financed health care, huge urban development projects and universal free education. But two decades of American and United Nations sanctions diminished Libyan oil revenues. The country's oil fields were declining, exploration was all but halted, and Libya was forbidden to import new oil extraction technology. At the same time, Libya's population was booming. In 1982 there were slightly fewer than three million people in Libya. By 2002, there were more than five million. In some cities, the annual growth rate topped an astronomical (and problematic) 7 percent. The mixture of population growth and declining oil revenues endangered Colonel Qaddafi's ability to hold on to power.
7/31/2004
About Me
- Name: Josh Eidelson
- Location: Sacramento, California, United States
Josh Eidelson received his Bachelor's and Master's Degrees in Political Science from Yale University, where he helped lead the Undergraduate Organizing Committee. He has written about local and national politics as an opinion columnist for the Yale DailyNews, a research fellow for Talking Points Media, and a contributor to CampusProgress.org. Views expressed here are solely his own. Contact: "jeidelson" at "gmail" dot com.
Write
Donate
Links
- American Civil Liberties Union
- American Prospect
- American Rights At Work
- Barbara Ehrenreich
- Campus Progress
- Center for Economic and Policy Research
- Change to Win
- Daily Kos
- David Sirota
- Democracy for America
- Eschaton
- Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting
- Finnegan's Wake
- Greg Palast
- Hyperempathic Politics
- Human Rights Watch
- Immigrant Worker Freedom Rides
- In All My Years
- IndyMedia
- Jewish Labor Committee
- Kensington Welfare Rights Union
- Labour Start
- Left in the West
- Mah Rabu
- MeretzUSA
- Mother Jones
- MoveOn
- MyDD
- National Interfaith Committeee for Worker Justice
- Nathan Newman
- The Nation
- National Gay and Lesbian Task Force
- New Israel Fund
- Progressive States Network
- Progressive Patriots Fund
- Progressive Review
- The Reaction
- SNAPNotes
- Talking Points Memo
- TPM Cafe
- Wal-Mart Watch
- Weapons of Class Instruction
- Working Life
Previous Posts
- I recently highlighted SEIU's endorsement of full ...
- No pesticide left behind: The Bush administrati...
- A hearty (if belated) welcome to radical scientist...
- In a shameful rebuke of New York's workers and of ...
- Profiling made easy: The Electronic Privacy Inf...
- Bush told a crowd today that "results matter." Li...
- I'd say Kerry's speech is comparable to Edwards': ...
- Nancy Pelosi just repeated her pledge never again ...
- Working Americans: Make no mistake about how the B...
- Well, it's no surprise to those of us who've seen ...
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home